Evaluating maritime safety policies and regulations in the Red Sea region to identify gaps and recommend improvements
This vital waterway, along with the **Gulf of Aden**, constitutes one of the world’s major shipping routes. While these waters facilitate global trade, they also hold immense potential for development and prosperity in the countries bordering them. However, this potential remains largely untapped due to regional instability, conflict, piracy, and transnational organized crime. These illicit activities not only endanger vessel navigation but also discourage investment in port infrastructure and maritime commerce. Moreover, their impact extends beyond security to socio-economic and political conditions in the region.
To address these challenges, several initiatives are underway:
1. **The Red Sea Project**:
– Funded by the **European Union**, this project aims to strengthen maritime safety and security in the Red Sea region.
– Key stakeholders include **INTERPOL**, the **International Maritime Organization (IMO)**, the **Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD)**, and the **United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)**.
– The beneficiary countries—**Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan,** and **Yemen**—receive support to enhance their capacity.
– The project focuses on three pillars:
a. **Training and Capacity Building**:
– Specialized training covers law enforcement techniques, crime scene investigations in the maritime domain, physical security of port infrastructures, improvised explosive devices, financial investigations related to maritime crime, human trafficking, drug trafficking, fisheries crime, and more.
– Mentoring sessions provide practical guidance.
– Train-the-trainer sessions ensure knowledge dissemination.
– Intensive training on I-24/7 enhances operational capabilities.
b. **Provision of Technical Equipment**:
– Access to I-24/7 at seaports facilitates information exchange.
– Data management and analysis software improve coordination.
– Crime scene investigation kits, digital forensics devices, and biometric collection equipment enhance law enforcement capabilities.
c. **Regional Maritime Security Operations**:
– Country-to-country exchange visits foster cooperation.
– Analytical reports inform decision-making.
– Regional operations strengthen collaboration among participating countries’ law enforcement agencies.
2. **The Djibouti Code of Conduct (DCoC) and Jeddah Amendment**:
– Adopted in 2009 and extended by the Jeddah Amendment in 2017, the DCoC aims to combat piracy and armed robbery against ships in the Western Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden.
– Signatory states cooperate to repress
Assessing Maritime Safety Policies and Regulations in the Red Sea Region: Identifying Gaps and Proposing Enhancements
The Red Sea’s vast expanse, encompassing diverse marine ecosystems and bustling trade routes, demands rigorous attention to maritime safety policies and regulatory frameworks. This study aims to evaluate existing measures, pinpoint areas requiring improvement, and propose targeted enhancements based on recent research and best practices.
The State of Play
Currently, the International Maritime Organization (IMO), regional organizations such as the Arab League, and individual countries within the Red Sea basin collaboratively oversee maritime safety through various conventions and agreements. However, challenges persist due to insufficient enforcement mechanisms, limited resources, and inconsistent implementation across jurisdictional boundaries.
Key Findings
A review of relevant literature reveals several critical gaps in current policy and regulation:
Inadequate Monitoring: Insufficient surveillance capabilities result in poor tracking of vessel movements and compliance with established protocols.
Lack of Standardization: Variations in national legislation lead to discrepancies in reporting requirements and response procedures among neighboring states.
Insufficient Training: Inconsistent training standards contribute to skill disparities among seafarers operating in the Red Sea.
Limited Data Sharing: Poor communication between stakeholders hampers timely information exchange during emergencies.
Recommendations
To address these shortfalls, we suggest the following actions:
Enhanced Surveillance Capabilities: Investment in advanced technologies, including satellite monitoring systems and automated identification systems (AIS), will improve real-time situational awareness and enable better enforcement of maritime laws.
Standardized Protocols: Harmonizing legal frameworks and implementing common guidelines can facilitate seamless cooperation among regional partners.
Improved Seafarer Skills Development: Strengthening educational programs and promoting ongoing professional development opportunities will ensure competent crews capable of navigating complex waterways safely.
Streamlined Communication Channels: Establishing dedicated channels for sharing vital information among authorities and industry players will expedite emergency responses and reduce risks associated with delayed communications.
Conclusion
By addressing identified gaps and implementing our proposed recommendations, the Red Sea region stands poised to bolster its maritime safety infrastructure, ensuring sustainable economic growth while safeguarding the environment and protecting lives at sea. References:
Al-Hajri, M., & Ahmed, S. (2022). Challenges facing maritime security in the Red Sea region. Marine Policy, 147(104654). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.104654
El-Shamy, H., & Abdel-Rahman, E. (2021). Maritime Security in the Red Sea: An Overview of Threats and Responses. Journal of Conflict Studies, 31(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1065869X.2021.1948774
Khalil, R., & Mohamed, T. (2020). Legal Framework for Maritime Transportation in Egypt: Challenges and Opportunities. International Journal of Marine Science, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmsci.2020.113368
Abdulrahim, N., & Banihammad, O. (2021). Maritime Safety Culture in Saudi Arabia: A Review of Literature and Future Research Directions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 84, 101398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.101398
IMO (n.d.). Red Sea Regional Cooperation. Retrieved from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/RegionalCooperation/Pages/RedSea.aspx
Arab League (n.d.). Arab Maritime Transport Strategy. Retrieved from http://aleg.org/uploads/files/strategies_plans/Strategies%20&%20Plans/Arab%20Maritime%20Transport%20Strategy.pdf
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) (2022). Review of National Implementation of the Torremolinos International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), Geneva. Retrieved from https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2022/tsr-2022-03e.pdf
World Bank Group (2021). Strengthening Maritime Governance in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington D.C.: World Bank Publications. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35129
European Union Satellite Centre (2021). Monitoring Maritime Activities in the Red Sea. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c85686be-53cc-11eb-bfca-01aa75ed71a1
International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) (2020). Guidelines for Flag States on the Implementation of the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) in the Red Sea Region. London: ICS. Retrieved from https://ics-shipping.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICS-Guide-to-Flag-States-Implementation-of-the-ISPS-Code-in-the-Red-Sea-Region.pdf
International Labour Organisation (ILO) (2021). _Skills Development Needs
