Economic Inequity: Who Should Pay for Health Care?
Introduction
The paper seeks to discuss the agencies and parties with the role to deliver healthcare services in the United States. In most of counties, they use a universal care program that is supported by the public. In the U.S, many people believe that private health care offers higher quality compared to the publicly health care. The situation creates a sense of completion between the public and the private health care services. The paper will provide the relevant evidences, data, and statistics to confirm which should be the most preferable form of health care systems in the U.S. the production of the medical care services relates to the development of relevant social aspects in the markets. The health care mechanism must be relevant in the delivery of quality health care in the markets. Some people argue that the private health care is more preferable due to the nature of the services. Every person considers health very critical in life and thus, any choices of treatment may cost the people heavily. Thus, people should consider their own private health coverage plans that alleviate any medical failures. In addition, the distribution of healthcare services is relevant in the determination of the significant forms of paying for the medical services either private and public health care. The paper will provide the crucial statistics and evidence to confirm the payment of the health care in the U.S.
The debate on the health care reforms seeks to specify the access of medical treatment as provided in the federal law. The debates surround the implications of costs of medical care and other relevant arrangement including the health insurance covers. The health care reforms propose the various reform programs that include the government roles and the free will of the consumers. The first policy seeks to create a universal coverage for all people, in which can be said to be public health care, while the second policy seeks to enhance universal choice of health care that includes the private health care (Smith, Albert and Jack 67).
The government relations are relevant in the implementation of the government mandates it relates to the provision of low-cost coverage in the purchase of health care insurances covers. For example, in Massachusetts, the government implemented a universal coverage that is more affordable. The government proposes the implementation of a single payer and government systems. The model calls for the implementation of a comprehensive health care program to administer low-income persons. The current situation of healthcare provides that most of the young people are uninsured to cater for their private medical services.
The proponents of the universal health care by the government are based on the choice plans. The plans relate to the implementation of key taxes and controls of the health care processes. Today, the government controls close to 55 per cent of the U.S health care economy through the various system s including Medicaid, Medicare, and other local government employee plans and procedures. According to the U.S census, it is estimated that close to 45million Americans do not have a health insurance. Also, close to 27 million people cannot afford the health insurance plans, but chooses not to take on the insurance coverage. Based on the statistics, the U.S government should develop favorable health care plans or subsidies on the health costs by the hidden taxes. The proponents of the universal health coverage argue that the Americans are legally bound to be provided with medical health care.
On the other hand, the opponents of the policy argue that most health young people are uninsured due to the increased cost of the monthly premiums at $400. The costs of the premiums relates to the government regulations based on the community rating. The costs of the health care undermines does not allow the government to meet the health care costs for very low-income earners. Since, the public health care proves to be very costly to the governments. It may lead to government budget deficits in the states and the federal government. The costs of the prescription drugs are reducing. In 2007, the inflation rises by close to 5 percent, while the price of the drugs only rose by one percent. The prescription drugs seek to lower health care costs in the long-term duration in order to enhance expensive hospital treatments. A recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found out that the insurance coverage from the private sector saves $1.97 (Smith, Albert and Jack 67).
The American policymakers relates to the determination of better prices in a long-term implications in the U.S. the development of y the full market prices are crucial in subsiding the costs of the prescription drugs in the county. Based on the policies implemented by the American policymakers, it is relevant to enhance healthcare services in the U.S. therefore, reduction in the cost of the drugs becomes relevant to support the private health coverage plans in the country. The single payer health systems are more preferable than the public health care services. Most countries in Write my essay for me – CA Essay writer Canada and European uses the single payer systems of heath care provisions. The systems have been confirmed to be more efficient than the U.S economy. A comparison of the health care systems in the U.S and Write my essay for me – CA Essay writer Canada indicates that the Canadians spend 9 percent of the GDP while the Americans spend 16 per cent of the U.S GDP. The Canadians pays hidden taxes for the health care programs that amount to $ 5,000 per year.
In addition, the single payments implemented by the government in the Write my essay for me – CA Essay writer Canada spend less money on medical technology and equipment. The government funded healthcare programs provides to be more efficient. Since, the decisions to treat particular diseases are based on relevant medical evaluation and analysis. The medical heath care in the U.S is consistent with quality and improved medical care in the world. Based on the proponents of consumer choice coverage plans, it indicates that the U.S health care plans offers free will of the customers relating to direct health care approaches. The development of consumer choices health care plans helps to place the decision of treatments on the consumers. The decision includes the choice of patients and costs of the medical programs. The governments seek to support the development of universal consumer choice to all the uninsured and under-insured Americans. Considering the logic that majority of the Americans between the age of 18 and 30 years are uninsured it calls for lower premiums in order to meet the individual’s needs. The healthcare tax deductions are key in the reduction costs involved in medication. In addition, the increased concerns on the implementation of government regulations fall within relevant heath care industry.
Based on the arguments, it is the mandate of the government to impose universal coverage to alleviate the problems of the uninsured in the society. The single payer system relates to the development consumer choice in the healthcare systems. There are substantial efforts made on the implementation of relevant health care programs in the U.S. The reduction of costs in the health care sector is significant in the creation of relevant screening. The U.S population lacks the development of insurance and inertia in the country. The scientific frameworks are relevant in development of appropriate levels in the health care costs. The identification of the wastes is key in the payment of fee-for-services payments in the economy. The combination of the insurance and fee-for services plans significant in the implementation of medical coverage plans. Furthermore, the establishment and development of strong medical bills are significant in the United States (Gulliford and Myfanwy 145). Health care spending has led to substantial economic growth of 2.7 percent in the economy those results to development of new technology. In the United States, the implications of health care relevant to access to favorable medical services.
Generally, the debate on the different health insurance plans in the both private and public health care plans. This relates to the risks on different health care insurance on the health care sector. The development of health insurance plans relates to the payments of adequate health insurance. The health insurances are relevant in the development of effective health insurance plans. The health insurance plans falls under the private health care services. The private health care accounts for 20 per cent of the costs in healthcare (McCormack, Kim and Angie 78). Therefore, debates advocates for more private health care plans in order to facilitate effective payments.
In summary, economic inequalities can be because of the different health care plans in the different. In the U.S, there have been relevant debates to compare the two proposed healthcare plans. The health care reforms propose the various reform programs that include the government roles and the free will of the consumers. The debates surround the implications of costs of medical care and other relevant arrangement including the health insurance covers. Based on the proponents of consumer choice coverage plans, it indicates that the U.S health care plans offers free will of the customers relating to direct health care approaches. Therefore, the private health care plans are more preferable.
Works Cited
Gulliford, Martin, and Myfanwy Morgan. Access to health care. London: Routledge, 2013.
McCormack, Brendan, Kim Manley, and Angie Titchen. Practice Development in Nursing and Healthcare. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Smith, Michael Ira, Albert I. Wertheimer, and Jack E. Fincham. Pharmacy and the US health care system. New York: Pharmaceutical Press, 2013.
