Topic: THE ETHICS OF BELIEF
Discipline: Philosophy

Instructions
Clifford argues that it is wrong, everywhere, always and for anyone, to believe something on the basis of insufficient evidence. Reconstruct Clifford’s argument, being sure to explain exactly what he thinks makes this morally wrong. How do you think this argument holds up in the modern day, in the face of online epistemic bubbles and echo chambers?

Published by
Essays
View all posts