Criminal homework help
Facts: State the facts of the case and why the case went to trial. 2. Issue: State what is at issue in the case. 3. Ruling: State the court’s ruling in the case. 4. Analysis: This section contains the bulk of the brief. In your analysis, address the following: a) In this case, what standard did the court use to determine whether the use of force was reasonable? For instance, what did the court say about judging the objective reasonableness of the use of force? b) What perspective did the court use in determining whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force? What did the court say about using hindsight to determine objective reasonableness? c) What strategies do you believe should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation? d) Analyze the connection between the issue of use of force and what criminological theory contributed to the understanding—or misunderstanding—of these issues. 5. Conclusion: Conclude the case brief by summarizing your analysis. What do you think should be done to make sure that police officers use the right amount of force in every situation? d) Analyze the link between the issue of using force and how criminological theory has helped us understand or misunderstand it. 5. Conclusion: Finish the case brief by summarizing what you found.
READ CASE STUDY BELOW
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/490/386/
PLEASE FOLLOW THE SAMPLE FORMAT AND USE Help write my thesis – APA SOURCES
—
CJ 500 Case Brief Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Many issues in the United States are focused on the application of force in the field of law enforcement. Questions have been raised as to whether
criminal justice professionals are applying the least amount of force necessary to gain compliance from an unwilling subject. Because of several recent
controversies surrounding the use of deadly force and the treatment of individuals in police custody, many members of society have been extremely critical of
the use of force. These controversial issues have created a negative public perception of law enforcement officers, and there have been demonstrations and
calls for reform in both the training and hiring of police officers.
For this assignment, you will first read and analyze the Graham v. Connor court decision. This decision is the seminal case that articulates when and how use-offorce situations will be reviewed and judged. As you read the case, consider who the key stakeholders are (police officers, police departments, citizens, etc.) in
the controversy and how this issue impacts the field of criminal justice.
Prompt: After reading the case, write a brief in which you address the elements listed below. This case brief will help you address the impact of similar decisions
in studying your own issue analysis for the final project. Set up your brief as the Sample Case Brief is set up, and include the answers to the questions in the
Analysis section of the brief.
1. Facts: State the facts of the case and why the case went to trial.
2. Issue: State what is at issue in the case.
3. Ruling: State the court’s ruling in the case.
4. Analysis: This section contains the bulk of the brief. In your analysis, address the following:
a) In this case, what standard did the court use to determine whether the use of force was reasonable? For instance, what did the court say about
judging the objective reasonableness of the use of force?
b) What perspective did the court use in determining whether the officer acted appropriately in the use of force? What did the court say about
using hindsight to determine objective reasonableness?
c) What strategies do you believe should be employed to make sure officers are applying the correct amount of force in any given situation?
d) Analyze the connection between the issue of use of force and what criminological theory contributed to the understanding—or
misunderstanding—of these issues.
5. Conclusion: Conclude the case brief by summarizing your analysis.
Reference your textbook reading as well as the case material in your submission. To facilitate this task, refer to the Sample Case Brief document.
Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be at least 1 page in length (in addition to title and reference pages). It should use single spacing, 12-point
Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Follow Help write my thesis – APA style for in-text citations and the reference list.
Rubric
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Facts Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
facts are detailed and specific
States the facts of the case and
why the case went to trial
States the facts of the case and
why the case went to trial, but
statement lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
Does not state the facts of the
case or why the case went to
trial
15
Issue Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with evidence
from the case to support
statement
States what is at issue in the case States what is at issue in the
case, but statement lacks detail
or contains inaccuracies
Does not state what is at issue in
the case
7
Ruling Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with evidence
from the case to support
statement
States the court’s ruling in the
case
States the court’s ruling in the
case, but statement lacks detail
or contains inaccuracies
Does not state the court’s ruling
in the case
7
Analysis:
Standard
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with evidence
from the case to support
identification
Identifies what standard the
court used to determine whether
the use of force was reasonable
Identifies what standard the
court used to determine whether
the use of force was reasonable,
but identification contains
inaccuracies
Does not identify what standard
the court used to determine
whether the use of force was
reasonable
15
Analysis:
Perspective
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with citations from
the case to support description
Identified the perspective the
court used to determine whether
the officer acted appropriately in
the use of force
Identifies the perspective the
court used to determine whether
the officer acted appropriately in
the use of force, but
identification lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
Does not identify the perspective
the court used to determine
whether the officer acted
appropriately in the use of force
15
Analysis:
Strategies
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with researchbased evidence to support
strategies
Identifies which strategies should
be employed to make sure
officers are applying the correct
amount of force in any given
situation
Identifies strategies to be
employed, but identified
strategies will not help to make
sure officers are applying the
correct amount of force in any
given situation
Does not identify which
strategies should be employed to
make sure officers are applying
the correct amount of force in
any given situation
15
Analysis:
Criminological
Theory
Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with examples of
criminological theory to support
connection
Analyzes the connection
between the issue of use of force
and which criminological theory
contributed to the understanding
(or misunderstanding) of these
issues
Analyzes the connection
between the issue of use of force
and which criminological theory
contributed to the understanding
(or misunderstanding) of these
issues, but analysis lacks detail or
contains inaccuracies
Does not analyze the connection
between the issue of use of force
and which criminological theory
contributed to the understanding
(or misunderstanding) of these
issues
15
Conclusion Meets “Proficient” criteria,
substantiated with evidence
from the case to support a
conclusion
Provides a conclusion that
summarizes the analysis
Provides a conclusion that
summarizes the analysis, but
conclusion contains inaccuracies
Does not provide a conclusion 7
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization, and is presented in
a professional, easy to read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
4
Total 100%
