Emergency Management
Student’s Name:
Institution:
Emergency Management
How would transformational leadership become involved during this incident?
Transformational leadership is a vital aspect in emergency management to ensure that relevant and reasonable changes are adopted in the right time and place to ensure that emergency operations are effectively and efficiently implemented in the interest of the victims and the common good. In transformational leadership, the leaders work with members of their teams to realize the needed changes, to develop goals and visions inclined towards the needed change and the execution of change together with all the relevant members of the groups, thus ensuring that a full range leadership style based on leadership is achieved.
The involvement in transformational leadership in incidents takes the adoption of difficult decisions in the interest of achieving the desired goals and objectives during the extraordinary times (Willis, Clarke, and O’Connor, 2017). The leaders are involved in the making of difficult decisions, and they are not shy from making such decisions despite the unpopularity of the decisions. The difficult decisions are made and implemented with a clear focus on the set visions, values, goals, and objectives of the organization.
Transformational leadership is characterized by the capability to take the right risks in the course of the operations. Transformational leaders take calculated risks to maximize the ability of their organizations to meet different goals and obligations (Willis, Clarke, and O’Connor, 2017). In the event of an incident, the transformational leader trusts their instinct and use intelligence gathered by the members of their teams to ensure that they make informed decisions despite the risks involved. The adoption of calculated risks makes it possible to facilitate growth and transform the incidents in the interest of the common good.
Transformational leaders get involved in incidents by inspiring their teams to ensure they can effectively and sufficiently complete different tasks (Willis, Clarke, and O’Connor, 2017). Transformational leaders have the ability to motivate their teams to rise to the occasion through formal acknowledgment, valuing the employees or team players, and understanding factors that motivate them. Emergency incidences are tough experiences, and thus the transformational leaders need to consistently motivate their teams to ensure they meet the desired goals.
Who would be some of the key personnel and team members involved in this incident?
In the shooting incidents, there are different key personnel from law enforcement agencies to be involved in different operations. The different personnel is required to work as a team to ensures that all aspects of the shooting incidents are covered through containing the incidents, conducting forensic investigations, and bringing to book the culprits of the shooting incidents as well as taking measures to ensure that such incidents a prevented in future.
In the shooting incident, the incident commander is key personnel to guide and control the operations through making decisions and liaising with the executives or the external parties to the incidents (McMains and Mullins, 2014). The shooting incidents are critical, and the law enforcers target at saving the most lives as well as containing the perpetrators, and thus critical decisions making is involved. The additional duties of the incident commander are ensuring protective measures are met, liaising with supervisory personnel, and elimination ignition sources.
The law enforcers such as the police are critical personnel are shooting incidents. The law enforcers from different agencies take orders from incident commanders in regard to conducting the operations. The law enforcers enforce the counter-attack force to contain the operations of the shooting incidents (McMains and Mullins, 2014). The law enforcers actively engage the criminals involved in the shooting incidents to incline them to stop or protect the civilians from further damage.
There are tactical response team members that are actively involved in the incident operations as they have different duties and responsibilities (McMains and Mullins, 2014). The personnel, in this case, involve the operational, safety managers, communications, liaison officers, and managing supervisors. The tactical response team ensures that they manage the incidents and guide the law enforcers on the ground in the interest of containing the situation.
Additionally, there are the forensic experts or teams that are involved in collecting and joining pieces of evidence after the incident is contained to ensure that perpetrators are brought to book (McMains and Mullins, 2014). The forensic evidence makes it possible to realize the motive and sources of the shooting. The evidence gathered by the forensic teams ensures that conclusions to the incidence are made preventing future such attacks through the lessons leaned.
Based on the ability of the active threat/shooter to enter into the hotel with several bags of firing arms and ammunition, how might leadership be able to increase security measures?
In the event that the shooter entered the hotel with several bags of firing arms and ammunition, there is a need for the leadership to increase security measures to ensure that the shooter is contained and the lives are saved. First, there is a need to access the location of the shooter in the hotel as well as the location of their arms and ammunition (Gaibulloev and Sandler, 2009). Containing the shooter and ensuring that they do not use firearms is an effective security measure. These locations of the shooter and the firearms can be established through accessing CCTV footage from the hotel or having an insider contact such as the security personnel in the control rooms. Consequently, the incident commanders need to dispatch a team of experienced law enforcement personnel to pursue the shooter from the building. This approach ensures that civilians are protected, and the threats are minimized by directly attacking the shooter.
What are some of the security measures that can be updated or put in place in an effort to handle a large arsenal of weapons?
The large arsenal of weapons needs to be handled with care as it poses threats to people and the government. In this regard, there is a need for safekeeping and storage of the arsenal of weapons from the sight and handle of criminals or other malicious parties (Gaibulloev and Sandler, 2009). In this regard, advanced technology and innovations need to be used to ensure that there is intrusion and activities happening around the storage facilities are monitored. For instance, sensors and CCTV cameras can be used for safety and protection needs in the storage facilities.
How might adaptive leadership play an integral role in the overall psychodynamic approaches on the new leadership style for this particular incident regarding the Las Vegas shooting?
Adaptive leadership ensures that leaders adopt frameworks that enable people and organizations to adapt to the changing environment and sufficiently handle recurring problems through the unconscious psychological process (Murthy and Murthy, 2014). The leaders, in this case, ensure that positive changes are adopted in the incident response and operations through learning from the experiences and the meaning of events through the unconscious mind. Shooting incidents such as the one in Las Vegas can be prevented in the future by adopting changes the necessary changes, and this can be achieved by riding on the past experiences of the people and meaning of every event.
The leaders need to introduce new leadership styles or changes through emotional intelligence (Murthy and Murthy, 2014). Emotional intelligence takes account of one’s own feelings and the feelings of other people, thus making it possible to implement changes that are in line with the common feeling among the people. Common emotions and feelings can be used as a basis of adopting new leadership styles in the interest of a common good.
Organizational justice is another aspect that can be used to achieve new leadership styles by fostering the culture of honesty (Murthy and Murthy, 2014). The leaders of incidences need to incorporate the people in addressing the incidences such that both the leaders and the people experience similar experiences of the incident. This approach ensures that policies can be changed in the interest of the experiences of the leaders and the people. People will embrace new policies as a form of leadership, thus making it possible to have new leadership styles in pace.
What are some of the adaptive leadership approaches that may need to be taken with the advent of this active threat/shooter opening fire from the 32nd floor of this hotel?
The adaptive leadership skills in the shooting incidence will ensure that people and the parties to the incident such as the law enforcers adopt the necessary changes in the interest of handling the situation to eliminate the threat, learn from itcr4eat a win-win solution and adopt a self-correction and reflection from it. First, the leader needs to create empathy in the operations through the creation of a group attitude as opposed to the divide and conquer atmospheres (Heifetz and Linsky, 2014). In the case of the shooter, the leader of the incident management needs to join hands with members of the hotel and external law enforcement agencies and persons of goodwill to enhance the handling of the shooter. This approach will ensure that there is a coordinated effort to overpower the shooter.
Additionally, the adaptive leaders need to have a chance for self-correction and reflection on action taken on the shooter to evaluate their success and if the approach yields the desired results (Heifetz and Linsky, 2014). The success aspects of the incident management need to be empowered and enhanced to ensure that they drive away from the shooter by overpowering him. On the other hand, the failures recorded need to serve as a lesson, and changes and improvements effected for future engagements. This approach ensures that the best approaches are consistently adopted to effectively counter the shooter in the interest of the security and safety of the people/victims.
References
Gaibulloev, K., & Sandler, T. (2009). Hostage taking: Determinants of terrorist logistical and negotiation success. Journal of Peace Research, 46(6), 739-756.
Heifetz, R. A., & Linsky, M. (2014). Adaptive Leadership: The Heifetz Collection (3 Items). Harvard Business Review Press.
McMains, M., & Mullins, W. C. (2014). Crisis negotiations: Managing critical incidents and hostage situations in law enforcement and corrections. Routledge.
Murthy, V., & Murthy, A. (2014). Adaptive leadership responses. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development.
Willis, S., Clarke, S., & O’Connor, E. (2017). Contextualizing leadership: Transformational leadership and Management‐By‐Exception‐Active in safety‐critical contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(3), 281-305.
