ENGL 1121: School Writing and Important Studying
Paper three: Supply Abstract and Evaluation
You may be utilizing quite a lot of sources in your analysis paper, doubtless of various varieties: books, articles, information tales,
web sites, interviews, and/or authorities stories. To a big diploma, the standard of your personal analysis work and the success
of your argument depends upon the standard of your sources: how do they help your concepts and lend convincing help and
credibility to what you are attempting to say? Sources which can be weak by way of content material or credibility will solely weaken your
personal work; this would come with sources that depend on weak proof, assumptions, or defective logic, and sources whose authors
are overly biased, unqualified to write down as consultants, or in any other case compromised by way of credibility. So selecting robust
sources is step one in utilizing robust sources. Consider this adage: “Rubbish in, rubbish out.”
This task asks you to discover a robust potential supply in your analysis mission, learn it, summarize it, and analyze it.
This supply have to be a broadcast written supply in print or on-line (not an unpublished supply, and never a supply like a
private interview). It doesn’t should be a scholarly supply (see data posted on D2L about distinguishing
scholarly sources from nonscholarly ones), however it ought to be credible, associated to your analysis subject, and substantial in
size (not less than 5 pages lengthy). It ought to be primarily based on sources itself, drawing on cited or named sources in its textual content.
One you could have discovered a supply you assume will work and also you’ve gotten teacher approval (see syllabus for due date), you
will summarize and analyze your supply by way of its content material, argument, rhetorical methods, supply use, credibility, and
general effectiveness. See under for extra steering about how to do that.
Ideally, this task can immediately contribute to your analysis paper. Select a supply that you simply would possibly use as a supply for
the analysis paper. This supply abstract and evaluation, nonetheless, shouldn’t be a part of the analysis paper itself and is a separate
writing mission. In case your plan for utilizing sources in your analysis paper adjustments later, that’s OK. You aren’t required to make use of
this supply in your last analysis paper.
For this writing task, you’ll need to learn your supply fastidiously. Print it out or make a duplicate so you’ll be able to mark it up.
Set up an correct and thorough understanding of the author’s primary level, and listen extra to how the author
makes his or her level. Take notes as you go.
Studying Targets:
After finishing this task, it’s best to have the ability to:
• determine and discover an applicable supply to be used in a tutorial analysis mission
• precisely summarize an editorial, capturing its primary level(s), construction, strategies, and defining options
• analyze how a supply communicates a primary level and helps its factors
• assess a supply’s credibility, content material, and effectiveness as an editorial
Minimal Necessities:
 600–900 phrases
 Teacher approval of your supply; supply ought to be not less than 5 pages lengthy
 An correct abstract of the supply content material, argument, and/or strategies
 Thorough evaluation of the supply
 Appropriate MLA fashion, together with a Works Cited quotation and any obligatory in-text citations
Supply Abstract
In a single substantial paragraph (most of 500 phrases), summarize the supply. Keep in mind, don’t but analyze or critique:
don’t embody your personal concepts or opinions within the abstract. Comply with our guidelines for abstract, and embody:
1. A full and proper MLA Works Cited quotation, initially of the doc
2. The total title of the supply and the creator’s or authors’ title(s)
three. The context of the supply’s level or content material, if specified (e.g., what bigger query, drawback, or dialogue the
writing is engaged in—the “they are saying”)
Four. The supply’s thesis or central level. You may paraphrase the thesis assertion, with an applicable quotation.
5. The creator’s or authors’ details or construction of their argument as they make their case
6. The sort(s) of proof used, if relevant
7. The strategy(s) used, if relevant
Supply Evaluation
Now, analyze and critique the supply you’ve learn and summarized. In 2-Four organized paragraphs, clarify how the authors
current their concepts. Take into account questions like:
• What sort of supply is it? A newspaper article? Scholarly analysis article? Authorities report? Web site?
• Who’re the authors? Is details about them and their qualifications included anyplace within the publication?
• What’s the publication through which this supply seems? Who’s the writer? What’s their popularity?
• How particular is the supply’s focus or scope? Does the author tie the primary level to any bigger questions or points?
• The place is the thesis or primary level said? How is it said (e.g., “This paper goals to show…,” or extra subtly?)?
• How is the writing organized? Do part headings divide up the textual content? Is there a transparent introduction and conclusion?
• The place you do discover the sources the creator used? Are footnotes, in-text citations, or bibliographies used?
• What forms of proof does the author use in his or her argument (e.g., information, surveys, interviews, texts, information)?
• What’s the vocabulary and tone like? Technical or nontechnical? Goal or opinionated? Critical or informal?
• Do the writers handle any counterarguments or conflicting concepts? In that case, how? To what extent?
• What sorts of illustrations (photos, tables, figures, and so on.) are used to current analysis, if any?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the supply, in your opinion?
• How do you foresee utilizing this supply in your personal analysis paper?
Grading Rubric for Closing Draft
A paper B paper C paper D paper
Quotation
(5 factors)
Quotation is full
and in good MLA (eighth
version) format
Quotation is full and
appropriate general in MLA
(eighth version) format
Quotation current, although
might have some errors or
lacking information
Quotation current, however not in
MLA, lacking main information,
or error-riddled
High quality of
Abstract
(20 factors)
Precisely and absolutely
captures primary thought and
content material of supply
Fulfills all standards of
abstract writing
Precisely captures
primary thought and content material of
supply
Fulfills most standards of
abstract writing
Provides an approximate
sense of the thesis and
supply’s details
Fulfills most standards of
abstract writing
Doesn’t precisely
talk the supply’s
thesis and content material
Doesn’t fulfill a lot of
the standards of summaries
Evaluation of
Supply
(20 factors)
Completely examines
supply’s argument,
options, and power
Considers credibility of
supply and use in
analysis writing
Examines supply’s
argument, options, and
power
Considers credibility of
supply and use in
analysis writing
Examines supply, however
wants extra essential
consideration to its argument,
strategies, or credibility
Considers use of supply,
however not in-depth
Reveals a superficial degree
of consideration to how the
supply builds argument
Doesn’t critically think about
use of supply in personal
writing
Paragraphs
(10 factors)
Subject sentences management
and form paragraphs
Nicely-developed
paragraphs present unity
and coherence
Subject sentences information
readers
Paragraphs present unity
and coherence
Clearer subject sentences
wanted
Paragraphs may very well be
higher organized and/or
may have extra
improvement
Paragraphs lack clear subject
sentences
Paragraphs should be
higher developed or revised
for coherence and unity;
abstract and evaluation are
intermixed
Model
(10 factors)
Abstract is completely
inthird-person
Clear sentences are
grammatically appropriate
Tone is formal and
skilled
Abstract makes use of primarily
third-person
Sentences are
grammatically appropriate
Tone is appropriately
formal
Abstract is usually in
third-person
Clear sentences; solely
occ. construction issues
Tone is sometimes
causal
Strays from third-person
Sentences lack readability;
frequent construction issues
Tone is just too informal
Errors
(5 factors)
Appropriate grammar,
spelling, and punctuation present nice care
Typically appropriate
grammar, spelling,
punctuation; reveals care
Sample of errors,
typos, incorrect
grammar; wants
proofreading
Sample of errors makes
prose troublesome to comply with
and evinces little care
Papers that fail to attain minimal requirements obtain a grade of F.

Published by
Write
View all posts