DNP Assignment help – Discussion Guidelines
Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.

Due Date
The initial posting to the graded collaborative discussions is due by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and faculty responses are due by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the collaborative discussions.

Assignment help – Discussion Criteria
Review the discussion criteria:

Application of Course Knowledge
· The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional examples. The student must completely answer the entire initial question.

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue
· The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

· Peer Response: The student responds substantively to at least one topic-related post by a student peer. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion.

· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the other student’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

· The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

· The peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

· The peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which Help write my thesis – APA style standards then apply.

· Faculty Response: The student responds substantively to at least one question by course faculty. The faculty question may be directed to the student, to another student, or to the entire class.

· A post of “I agree” with a repeat of the faculty’s post does not count as a substantive post. A collection of shallow posts does not equal a substantive post.

· The faculty response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting.

· Responses to the faculty member must occur by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

· This response does not require a scholarly citation and reference unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, in which Help write my thesis – APA style standards then apply.

Integration of Evidence
· The student post provides support from a minimum of at least three (3) sources which may include assigned readings, or weekly module content, or outside scholarly sources. The scholarly source when used is: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years, and 4) an in-text citation. The student initial response to the graded discussion must include at least 1 source. Responses to peer and/or faculty, citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which Help write my thesis – APA style standards then apply.

· It is important that student utilizes support from the literature that is grounded in the literature providing sources relevant to the discussion posting. One source may come from the online weekly content.

· Scholarly Sources

· Two (2) scholarly sources should be used in the discussion board assignments across the week.

· These include peer-reviewed publications.

· Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. However, in some assignments, support from textbooks may be used on a limited basis when accompanied with additional scholarly sources if specified in the assignment guidelines or with instructor approval.

· Scholarly sources may be present in the weekly readings and students may choose to utilize these.

· Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used.

· Sources should be no more than five years old unless they are historical or seminal references or approved by your instructor.

· Literature Sources:

· Grey literature is scholarly but not peer-reviewed. These resources can be used but do not meet requirements for peer-reviewed sources.

· Refer to the assignment guidelines to determine which grey literature sources (e.g., professional organization website, white papers) are appropriate to be used for discussions or assignments and would constitute receiving full credit for using this resource in the paper or discussion.

· Government reports are actually part of the grey literature – they are not peer reviewed and the government’s main purpose is not the publication of literature.

· Internet resources on dissertations, a form of grey literature, provide additional views on the scholarly level of this literature

· Papers written for Chamberlain College of Nursing should be the student’s original work and contain no more than one short quotation for every three pages or as designated in the assignment guidelines. Quotations should be avoided if possible.

(Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers, 2020)

Professionalism in Communication
· The post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, and is clearly relevant to the discussion topic. Grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate.

Wednesday Participation Requirement
· The student provides a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Total Participation Requirement
· The student provides at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

Rubric
Assignment help – Discussion Criteria

Highest Level Performance: A

Very Good or High Level of Performance: B

Acceptable Level of Performance: C

Failing Level of Performance: F

Left blank

10 points

9 points

8 points

0 points

Application of Course Knowledge:

Answers initial discussion question(s)/ topic(s), demonstrating knowledge, understanding of weekly concepts.

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding.

Does not address the initial question(s).

Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue with Peers and Faculty:

The student responds to a student peer and course faculty to further dialogue.

Responds to student peer AND course faculty furthering dialogue by providing more information and clarification, adding much depth to discussion.

Responds to a student peer AND course faculty furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty, adding minimal depth to the discussion.

No response post to another student or course faculty.

Integration of Evidence:

Includes assigned readings, or weekly module content, or outside scholarly sources.

Includes three sources to support weekly concepts.

A scholarly source is defined on page 2 of these guidelines. These sources may be evident across the 3 postings.

Sources are credited.*

At least 3 sources to support posts.

Sources are credited.*

At least 2 sources to support posts.

Sources are credited.*

At least 1 source to support posts.

No scholarly source provided to support posts.

Professionalism in Communication

Presents information using clear, concise language in organized manner (0-1 error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Presents information using clear, concise language in organized manner (2-3 error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Presents information using understandable language; information is not organized

4-5 error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional, or organized; reader has difficulty understanding the post; 6 or more error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation).

Participation
Left blank

5 points

0 points

Participation Wednesday Response: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Posts substantive response to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Does not post substantive response to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Total Participation

Responses: Participates in discussion thread at least three times on at least 2 different days.

Posts in discussion at least three times

AND on two different days during discussion week.

Posts fewer than three times

OR does not participate on at least two different days during discussion week.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday.

A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.

* Using Help write my thesis – APA style and formatting, in text citations are included for all sources. Matching references are included for all in-text citations. Due to the formatting constraints of Canvas, references included in the discussion must include complete information. Canvas will not allow a hanging indent; it is not required.

The Purpose of the DNP Assignment help – Discussion Guidelines
The goal of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage instructors and students in an engaging dialogue to help students organize, integrate, apply, and critically appraise advanced nursing practice knowledge. Scholarly material from reliable sources is necessary, as is professional communication. The examination and application of ideas, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional circumstances is facilitated by applying information to professional experiences. As ideas, opinions, and knowledge are shared, meaningful discourse between instructors and students encourages the growth of a learning community.

Date of Submission
By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, the initial posting to the graded collaborative conversations is due. The deadline for peer and faculty responses is Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 postings must be submitted by Saturday, 11:59 p.m. MT, at the end of class. Please keep in mind that the collaborative conversations are exempt from the late assignment policy.

Criteria for discussion
Examine the following criteria for discussion:

The student post adds unique viewpoints or insights acquired from personal experience or examples from the healthcare industry, as well as application of course knowledge. In addition to offering personal or professional examples, the student must accurately and completely describe the topic for the week. The student must answer the initial question completely.

Student Participation in Meaningful Dialogue The student responds to a student peer and the course teacher to continue the conversation.

Peer Response: At least one topic-related post by a student peer receives a significant response from the student. A substantive post offers knowledge or insights, or poses a question, to enhance the learning experience and/or spark conversation.

A post that just says “I agree” and then repeats the other student’s response is not considered substantial. A compilation of superficial posts is not the same as a substantive post.

The peer response must take place on a different day than the initial posting.

Before Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, the peer response must be sent.

Unless the content is summarized and/or direct quotes are used, the peer response does not require a scholarly citation and reference, in which case Help write my thesis – APA style requirements apply.

Faculty Response: At least one inquiry from the course faculty receives a significant response from the student. The faculty member may ask the student, another student, or the entire class a question.

A “I agree” post that is only a duplicate of the faculty’s post does not qualify as a meaningful post. A compilation of superficial posts is not the same as a substantive post.

The faculty response must take place on a different day than the original publication.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, responses to the faculty member must be submitted.

Unless the information is summarized and/or direct quotes are utilized, in which case Help write my thesis – APA style requirements apply, this response does not require a scholarly citation and reference.

Integration of Evidence The student post incorporates evidence from at least three (3) sources, which could include prescribed readings, weekly module content, or scholarly articles from outside sources. When a scholarly source is used, it must meet the following criteria: 1) it must be evidence-based, 2) it must be scholarly in nature, 3) it must have been published within the last 5 years, and 4) it must have an in-text citation. At least one source must be included in the student’s initial response to the graded discussion. When information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, Help write my thesis – APA style requirements apply, and responses to peers and/or instructors, citations, and references are given.

It is critical that students rely on literature for support, which is founded in the literature and provides sources pertinent to the discussion thread. One such source is the online weekly material.

Scholarly References

Throughout the week, two (2) academic sources should be used in the discussion board tasks.

Peer-reviewed journals are among them.

Textbooks aren’t regarded as scholarly resources. However, if specified in the assignment criteria or with instructor consent, textbook support may be used on a restricted basis in particular assignments when supplemented by extra scholarly materials.

Students may choose to use scholarly materials that are included in the weekly readings.

It is not recommended that you use Wikipedia, Wikis,.com websites, or blogs.

Unless they are historical or crucial references or have been allowed by your instructor, sources should be no more than five years old.

Literature References:

The term “grey literature” refers to scholarly work that has not been peer-reviewed. These resources are usable, but they do not meet the criteria for peer-reviewed sources.

Refer to the assignment guidelines to see whether grey literature sources (e.g., professional organization websites, white papers) are eligible for discussions or assignments and will get you full credit for incorporating them in the paper or discussion.

Government reports are considered grey literature because they are not peer-reviewed because the government’s primary goal is not to publish literature.

Internet dissertation materials, which are a type of grey literature, add to the scientific level of this literature.

Papers prepared for Chamberlain College of Nursing should be the student’s own work, with no more than one short quotation every three pages or as specified in the assignment criteria. If at all possible, avoid using quotations.

(2020 Chamberlain Guidelines for Professional Paper Writing)

Communication Professionalism The post delivers information in a logical, coherent, and understandable order, and it is clearly pertinent to the conversation topic. The spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation are correct.

Wednesday Participation Requirement: By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, the student submits a significant response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s) presented by the course instructors (not a response to a peer).

Total Participation Requirement: On two different days during the week, the student makes at least three meaningful posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty query).

Criteria for Assignment help – Discussion in a Rubric

A+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

A+ or A+ level of performance: B+ or A+ level of performance: B+ or A+ level of

Acceptable Performance Level: C

Failing Performance Level: F

Blank space has been left

10 out of 10

9 out of 10

8 out of 10

0 out of 10

Course Knowledge in Practice:

Answers the first question(s)/topic(s) in the discussion, exhibiting knowledge and understanding of the weekly ideas.

Applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding, addresses all facets of the initial discussion question(s).

Applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding, addresses the majority of the initial discussion question(s).

Applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding, addresses certain parts of the initial discussion question(s).

Doesn’t answer the question that was posed in the first place (s).

Participation in Meaningful Dialogue with Peers and Professors:

To continue the conversation, the student responds to a student peer and the course teachers.

Responds to student peers AND course professors who want to continue the conversation by providing further information and clarification, which adds a lot of depth to the conversation.

Responds to a student peer AND a member of the course faculty who adds depth to the conversation.

Responds to a student peer and/or course faculty member, but only adds a little substance to the conversation.

There was no response to another student’s or course faculty’s post.

Evidence Integration:

Included are assigned readings, weekly module content, and scholarly publications from other sources.

There are three sources to back up the weekly topics.

On page 2 of these rules, a scholarly source is defined. These sources may be found in all three posts.

Sources are acknowledged.

At least three sources to back up your claims.

Sources are acknowledged.

At least two sources to back up your claims.

Sources are acknowledged.

At least one source to back up your claims.

There is no scholarly source to back up the claims.

Communication Professionalism

Presents information in an orderly, clear, and succinct manner (0-1 error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Presents information in an orderly, clear, and succinct manner (2-3 error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Presents information in a clear and understandable manner; yet, the material is not arranged.

4-5 common grammatical, spelling, syntactic, and punctuation errors).

Reader has difficulties reading the post; 6 or more error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

Participation is not required.

5 out of 5

0 out of 10

Wednesday is Participation Day. Response: By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, responds to the original discussion question(s).

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, post a significant response to the introductory discussion question(s).

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m., no significant response to the first discussion question(s) has been posted. MT.

Total Involvement

Participates in the discussion thread at least three times over the course of two days.

At least three times throughout the conversation

INCLUDING TWO DAYS DURING DISCUSSION WEEK.

Posts fewer than three times

OR does not participate on at least two different days during discussion week.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Saturday.

A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assigned.

Faculty may submit any collaborative discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify originality.

* Using Help write my thesis – APA style and formatting, in text citations are included for all sources. Matching references are included for all in-text citations. Due to the formatting constraints of Canvas, references included in the discussion must include complete information. Canvas will not allow a hanging indent; it is not required.

Published by
Thesis
View all posts